Document: |Minutes|Case |Aris Otte v. Ritzert Arij; default; accusation of embezzlement of arrested goods; onderschout informed

|Minutes|Case|Pieter Cornelisen Bos: attorney of Philips Schoerlemaar: v. Lauwerens Jansen: demand for payment of debt for bottomry bond: testimony of Claes Bording and Pieter Jacobsen Marius: exhibiting accounts relating to the estate of Anna Cornelisen: ordered to pay |List||Minutes|Case||Minutes|Case|Schout Nicasius de Sille v. Hermen Barensen van Amsterdam; demand for punishment for theft; begs for mercy; condemned to whipping; banishment; and confiscation of goods |Note|That Paulus van de Beeck enters surety for his son in the suit with Mighiel Paulusen