Document: Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Huijbert Verschie: default: demand for deposit: defendant ordered to produce proof

Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Huijbert Verschie: default: demand for deposit: defendant ordered to produce proof|List||Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Lambert Barensen: demand for payment of debt and fine for breaking arrest: ignorance pleaded: ordered to pay|Minutes|Case|Joannes Withart and Jacobus Vis v. Paulus Heimans: demand for payment of debt for beer according to account: ignorance pleaded: ordered to pay|Minutes|Case|Jacobus Vis v. Paulus Heimans: demand for payment of debt for delivered merchandize: disputed: referred to arbitrators