Document: Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Margriet Jelis: default: demand for fine for allowing drinking during preaching: deposit ordered

Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Margriet Jelis: default: demand for fine for allowing drinking during preaching: deposit ordered|List||Minutes|Case|Schout Pieter Tonneman v. Ambrosius Weerhem: default|Minutes|Case|Isaack de Foreest v. Jan Hendrickzen van Bommel: default|Minutes|Case|Eghbert Meinderzen v. Stoffel van Laar: default|Minutes|Case|Bartholomeus van Schel v. Jan Gerritzen van Buijtenhuijze: default|Minutes|Case|Pieter Janzen v. Abel Hardenbroeck and Claas Dicklofzen: default|Minutes|Case|Claas Dicklofzen v. Frerijck Flipzen: demand for payment of debt for delivery of firewood: subsequently lost: disputed: ordered to pay